20% weight
82ATS compatibility and parsability
Illustrative evidence: The document uses standard sections and the text is readable, but dense formatting may slow scanning.
Illustrative sample report
See what the diagnostic explains before you upload.
This fictional example shows the expected report hierarchy: an overall interpretation, weighted category scores, supporting evidence, priority gaps, and practical next steps.
Weighted breakdown
Understand why the score was assigned.
A useful diagnostic should connect every category to a reason and observable resume evidence. A number without explanation is not enough.
20% weight
68Role targeting and alignment
Illustrative evidence: The target function is visible, but the opening summary and skills language are still broad.
25% weight
71Evidence, impact, and outcomes
Illustrative evidence: Several achievements are present, but too many bullets describe activity without enough scope or outcome.
15% weight
79Structure and recruiter readability
Illustrative evidence: The hierarchy is generally clear, although older experience could be compressed.
15% weight
70Seniority, scope, and positioning
Illustrative evidence: Leadership is implied, but decision influence, enterprise scope, and ownership need stronger evidence.
5% weight
85Completeness and screening friction
Illustrative evidence: Core information is present and there are no major extraction or completeness concerns.
Highest-priority opportunities
Focus first on the changes most likely to improve clarity.
The report is designed to prioritize rather than overwhelm. Recommendations should be specific enough to act on and appropriately qualified when context is limited.
Priority 1
Clarify the target level in the opening third
Replace the broad summary with a concise positioning statement that names the function, level, scope, and strongest value themes.
Priority 2
Strengthen evidence of ownership and impact
Prioritize bullets that show decisions, scale, complexity, measurable outcomes, and what changed because of the work.
Priority 3
Align the language to the target role
Use relevant employer language naturally where it accurately describes the candidate's experience.
Illustrative improvement
Show the difference without inventing a career.
Paid support can turn a diagnostic into clearer, more specific language. Every final statement must remain truthful and supportable by the client's actual experience.
“Experienced professional responsible for strategy, operations, reporting, and project management across multiple teams.”
“Strategy and operations leader translating complex business priorities into executive-ready plans, measurable performance improvement, and cross-functional execution.”
Truthfulness standard: This example improves focus and language without adding unsupported metrics, responsibilities, or experience. Never add a number, scope statement, accomplishment, or credential that cannot be supported as accurate.
Free versus personalized support
The report identifies priorities. Human support helps make the decisions.
The complimentary diagnostic is useful on its own. Personalized services add direct review, collaboration, rewriting, LinkedIn alignment, interview-narrative development, and judgment about what should change.
- Overall directional positioning score
- Six weighted category scores
- Reasons, evidence, and confidence
- Priority gaps and recommendations
- Direct founder review and collaboration
- Targeted resume and LinkedIn improvements
- Decisions about emphasis, removal, and career narrative
- Interview positioning and next-step guidance
Your report
Get a diagnostic based on your resume and target role.
The actual output will depend on the document, career level, target role, and context you provide.